Because my free time has been very limited over the past months, and because I am now writing for a living, I have been spending far more time on Facebook than on Blogger. When I'm sitting at my computer, working on an article or a grant, I can flip over to Facebook for a five minute break, and happily, I've been able to keep up with some of my blogging friends this way. One of those friends is Claire, of A Seat at the Table. Today she has shared several wonderful ruminations on Advent and Christmas, which I have been so inspired by that I had to come blog about it, even though a huge pile of laundry, an unwritten article, and unbaked goodies await my attention.
One of the links she shared was a post called Annunciations All the Time, at dotMagis. The author shares the poem, "Annunciation," by Denise Levertov (one of my favorite poets). This poem deals with the idea that we are always being presented with things to say "yes" to the way Mary said yes to the angel. And this brought me back to something I've been ruminating about this Advent, which is the part of Mary's 'yes' that included giving birth away from home, in a stable (or cave, as I hear is more accurate).
It seems to me that if an angel came to me and told me I was going to give birth to the son of God, saying yes would be a no-brainer. But then if the time came to give birth and I found myself far from home and family, in a dirty stable, I'd be questioning if it really was God after all. I'd be thinking, "This can't be right, this can't be the way such a one should be born."
Last year, I blogged about the messiness of Christmas. This year, I am deeper in the messiness, not just of Christmas but of life. How is it that my most cherished notions of the way things should be can be so far from reality? It helps me to think of Mary in the stable, saying Yes.
Claire shared another poem by Denise Levertov, on her own blog today, and this one is about the importance of welcoming grief when it comes. I can't help but put this together with my Mary rumination. When we think of grief, we usually think of the big losses, of people we love dying, but there are so many little losses. So many. And some losses we experience as big even when they might not seem so to others. I think again of Mary in the stable, of reconciling with the loss of an imagined experience of giving birth surrounded by the comfort and familiarity of home and loved ones. For me, this would likely bring a sense of great loss, and I would grieve. For Mary, it was the introduction to a life of losses around her son. And for all of us with children, we know that the moment we give birth, we begin to lose them.
To allow grief is to say yes to the loss that has caused the grief, and then to open up a new and more abundant set of possibilities. This is what I continue to learn at deeper and deeper levels, or actually, in more and more circumstances, even the ones that have seemed impossible to accept.
The third link Claire has shared today is to a post called The Christmas We Are Waiting For, by Sister Joan Chittister, and it reflects upon the Advent theme of waiting. Chittister comments that Christ's birth was really about establishing a whole new order, which in many ways, disappointed those who were waiting for a Messiah. She asks, "For what have we been waiting...For the restoration of the old order or for the creation of the new?"
The creation of the new may be very different from what I had imagined and thought right, and I will grieve the loss of the old, but doing so may be the only way to really let go of it and welcome true freedom, peace, and joy.
May we all be awake to the blessings of the season, in whatever messy form they come.
Showing posts with label The Way It Is. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Way It Is. Show all posts
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Friday, September 17, 2010
Setting Scraps of Light on Fire
![]() |
Scraps of light through the adobe ruins next to the grove |
Today is my one year blogoversary. It is this and only this that has finally gotten me to sit down and write a post. I have missed blogging and think about it almost every day, but my life has become so full of other things that I haven't had the inspiration. To find some, I walked over to the church today, but there were too many people around so I ended up in the grove, where I sat and wrote this post by hand. I have found myself sitting in the grove more often lately than in the church courtyard. It's green again, although the mass graves of trees are still untended.
So much has happened since I last posted, that I don't know where to begin. Should I tell you about my busy life? The immense sense of loss and sadness I've been feeling? Should I talk about how disconnected I've become from my writing?
Or maybe I should try to be more positive, and tell you about my discoveries about bats, or the white cat I keep seeing, or my lemon tree dream. But all these things are moments that have passed, inspirations that have faded in the face of too much work.
I'm not happy. I know I need to just accept the way my life is right now, surrender to it. Believe me, I'm working on that moment by moment, but there is a very sad little girl inside me who wants to come out and play. And I don't know what to tell her to make her stop banging on the door.
And I realize how much I miss you all, my blogging friends. It's not only the writing that I miss, it's the community, the support. I feel very alone in my life these days, very much like I'm carrying a heavy burden by myself. Stumbling and faltering under it.
But life goes on, and I just keep taking the next step. At times I have glimpses of all this as a journey of significance, but mostly it just feels like stumbling in the dark. I get tired of trying to hang onto the scraps of light that are tossed me. I get mad at God for not giving me more, and then I'm ashamed for feeling that way.
And that's why I need - NEED - to write about those scraps, because it's the only way for me to hold onto them as guides, as reminders of the greater journey, the better story. I need to tell you about last week when I had both a butterfly and a dragonfly on my finger in the same day. They were both trapped in my house at different points, and I freed them.
I need to tell you about dreaming of a sugarlaced lemon tree so glorious that gazing up into it was like eating the sun.
I need to tell you about the lessons bats have been trying to teach me about surrender and rebirth, about echolocation, in which bats navigate in the dark by using their voices to create sounds that reverberate off objects - the ability to see with the ears, to hear with the voice. Because by telling you, I have a greater chance of really learning the lessons, internalizing and integrating them. I too hear with my voice. I learn by teaching.
And now, just by writing all this, I feel lighter, happier, inspired, free. It occurs to me that this post follows a similar structure to some of the biblical psalms that start out with a lament and end with praise because by writing the lament the psalmist has seen the joy again.
Now I see that the writing I haven't been doing had hardened around me like ice, that scraps of light left unshared leave me cold, and once that happens, I have to write into the cold to break through it.
The fire must be tended or it dies out. The fire must be fed, and for me that means writing it.
Labels:
bats,
Bible,
blogging,
butterfly,
dragonfly,
dreams,
echolocation,
freedom,
God,
integration,
joy,
lemon tree,
praise,
San Francisco de Asis church,
sorrow,
stories,
teaching,
The Way It Is,
writing
Monday, June 21, 2010
Graffiti and Roses
Today is the Summer Solstice, and what that immediately conjures in my mind is Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream and a vague longing for romance and the ocean.
But I am single, and nowhere near the ocean. I was hoping to visit the west coast this summer, but chose instead to put money into a writer's conference that will be happening here in Taos. (Have I mentioned that I'm writing a book about my relationship with the San Francisco de Asis church?) My heart right now is very much with the Gulf Coast, and so at this Solstice time of great light and life, I am permeated with the awareness of darkness and death. I feel it in my own body.
Today is also Honoring Sacred Sites day, and so I send my light and life to the Gulf Coast, the sacred ocean. And I turn, as I do every day, toward the San Francisco de Asis church, the sacred site right outside my door.
Taos is a tourist town, and each summer a theme is chosen to center activities and events around. Last year it was "The Summer of Love," and the focus was on Taos' strong and enduring hippie culture. Dennis Hopper came for the opening of his art show. This year the theme is "Return to Sacred Places." In fact, the newspaper held an essay contest for Taos residents around this theme, and I got an honorable mention for my essay about the church.
Because of this theme, there has been a lot of focus on the St. Francis church, with talks given and three art shows around town. I missed the talk that was given at the public library on June 5, but was lucky enough to catch it on the radio the other night. The thing that most struck me in this talk, given by David Maes, who is a lifelong resident of Ranchos de Taos and member of the church, was in his introduction. He spoke of how the church belongs to anyone who experiences its sacredness, and how even the air around the church feels holy and refreshing.
I did not participate in enjarre, the annual remudding, which is now over. There is a variety of reasons for that, but one of the most unexpected ones was the sense of loss I've been experiencing over the cutting down of trees in the grove by the church. It left a bad taste in my mouth and made me want to stay away from the church altogether. It was several days after seeing all the stumps before I could go back, and when I did, the stumps had all been overturned so that the whole space resembles a twisted wasteland.
The next time I went, a few days after that, I discovered that the entrance to the grove between the gift shop and rectory was now defined with edging and filled with gravel.
I have to admit I'm having trouble with these changes. A little bit of wildness has been tamed. I don't think the birds are happy about it either. The doves have been completely silent and the crows have sounded so angry lately. They've been congregating and having screechfests in my yard. I know I've mentioned the birdlife at the church before but I want to give you a clearer picture of this. It's really only been in the past month or two that I've realized how central the church is to the bird communities of Ranchos de Taos. There are more birds in this part of Taos than any other, and what I finally realized is that the church is their crossroads, their center. They fly back and forth, in and out from that hub. Maybe it's my imagination, but it seems like there's been less bird traffic since enjarre began.
And I can't help but wonder how St. Francis would feel about all this. One of the things he was famous for was going around and restoring rundown churches, but I wonder how far he took that, balanced against his intense reverence for Mother Earth and her creatures. Sigh. Well, what's done is done, and there is nothing for me to do but accept and integrate these changes, and continue to simply observe them. One thing I do like is the new sign that marks the entrance to the grove from the church side:
The grove is still in flux. Orange fencing surrounds the area near the adobe ruins that borders the grove, and certain spaces are marked out in a way that suggest something is planned. Perhaps I've never mentioned the ruins before. It's hard to give you the scope of it with my simple camera, but here's a try:
It's not the Parthenon, but there is still something sacred in this to me, even or perhaps especially in the graffiti. There is a sacredness in the way we leave our artful marks on things. I love the way recent generations have come up with ways to do this even in urban landscapes. Graffiti, skateboarding, and parkour are all ways to use and add to the mundane and manmade in elevated ways, turning the utilitarian into the artful, for the sheer joy of it. (I must mention here that I love the concept of Tess' blog, Sacred Graffiti; I highly recommend you visit there.)
After some inquiry at the gift shop, I discovered that the activity around the ruins is because an archaeology group is doing excavation. When the church was first built, it was surrounded by a fort, and the buildings later became private residences, many of which are still occupied. Since those buildings hold a lot of history, it makes sense that an archaeology group would be interested in the ruins.
On the other side of the ruins is the church lot, a deep contrast in its manicured beauty. Now that things have calmed down a bit over there, I've been able to settle in and enjoy it again. Today, a man was revarnishing the benches in the courtyard.
I love to see the seasonal changes over there. The flowers that the hawkmoths come to aren't blooming yet, but the rose bushes are in full bloom, something I missed last year because I didn't start walking to the church until after the blossoms had faded.
I'm thinking about the pruning metaphor again in terms of manmade changes versus "natural" ones. I once had a student who wrote an astonishing paper using Emerson's ideas about nature to back up the claim that everything humans do is natural. Is the grove-clearing and throwing down of gravel as natural and beautiful as any seasonal change of the flora? My instinctive resistance to this idea is based on the fear that if we believe that, it gives us license to do all kinds of real damage, just the way that verses from Genesis about mankind having "dominion" over Creation have been used to justify all sort of horrible nonsense. And yet, partially thanks to that student's paper, and also Byron Katie's teachings, I can't help but wonder: If we consciously saw things in this way would it not ultimately give us a greater, not a lesser, awareness and sense of responsibility in our interactions with the natural world? In fact, we would no longer see ourselves as being separate enough to have "interactions with" the natural world, but would know ourselves to be part of the organic whole.
I don't know. If I've learned anything in my four decades here on Earth, it's that it's a long road from ideology to integration. But on this Solstice day of honoring sacred sites, it feels like an appropriate rumination. Graffiti and roses, skateboarding and birdflight, excavation and pollination, pruning, enjarre, restoration, decomposition - my former student would say these things are equal to each other, equally natural. What has always appealed most to me about the St. Francis church, which is the most sacred place in the world to me, is the dance among nature, culture, spirituality, religion, art, tradition. And the paradoxes in all of it, the paradox in my relationship to it as an intimate outsider.
What better way to honor the seasonal changes of nature and sacred sites both "natural" and manmade than to perceive ourselves as fully integrated with and responsible for them the way we are responsible for our own selves? This is also National Prayer Day, and the only prayer I have is for this, and then to rest in the holy paradoxes, the mysteries to be integrated within and beyond our ideologies.
But I am single, and nowhere near the ocean. I was hoping to visit the west coast this summer, but chose instead to put money into a writer's conference that will be happening here in Taos. (Have I mentioned that I'm writing a book about my relationship with the San Francisco de Asis church?) My heart right now is very much with the Gulf Coast, and so at this Solstice time of great light and life, I am permeated with the awareness of darkness and death. I feel it in my own body.
Today is also Honoring Sacred Sites day, and so I send my light and life to the Gulf Coast, the sacred ocean. And I turn, as I do every day, toward the San Francisco de Asis church, the sacred site right outside my door.
Taos is a tourist town, and each summer a theme is chosen to center activities and events around. Last year it was "The Summer of Love," and the focus was on Taos' strong and enduring hippie culture. Dennis Hopper came for the opening of his art show. This year the theme is "Return to Sacred Places." In fact, the newspaper held an essay contest for Taos residents around this theme, and I got an honorable mention for my essay about the church.
Because of this theme, there has been a lot of focus on the St. Francis church, with talks given and three art shows around town. I missed the talk that was given at the public library on June 5, but was lucky enough to catch it on the radio the other night. The thing that most struck me in this talk, given by David Maes, who is a lifelong resident of Ranchos de Taos and member of the church, was in his introduction. He spoke of how the church belongs to anyone who experiences its sacredness, and how even the air around the church feels holy and refreshing.
I did not participate in enjarre, the annual remudding, which is now over. There is a variety of reasons for that, but one of the most unexpected ones was the sense of loss I've been experiencing over the cutting down of trees in the grove by the church. It left a bad taste in my mouth and made me want to stay away from the church altogether. It was several days after seeing all the stumps before I could go back, and when I did, the stumps had all been overturned so that the whole space resembles a twisted wasteland.
The next time I went, a few days after that, I discovered that the entrance to the grove between the gift shop and rectory was now defined with edging and filled with gravel.
I have to admit I'm having trouble with these changes. A little bit of wildness has been tamed. I don't think the birds are happy about it either. The doves have been completely silent and the crows have sounded so angry lately. They've been congregating and having screechfests in my yard. I know I've mentioned the birdlife at the church before but I want to give you a clearer picture of this. It's really only been in the past month or two that I've realized how central the church is to the bird communities of Ranchos de Taos. There are more birds in this part of Taos than any other, and what I finally realized is that the church is their crossroads, their center. They fly back and forth, in and out from that hub. Maybe it's my imagination, but it seems like there's been less bird traffic since enjarre began.
And I can't help but wonder how St. Francis would feel about all this. One of the things he was famous for was going around and restoring rundown churches, but I wonder how far he took that, balanced against his intense reverence for Mother Earth and her creatures. Sigh. Well, what's done is done, and there is nothing for me to do but accept and integrate these changes, and continue to simply observe them. One thing I do like is the new sign that marks the entrance to the grove from the church side:
The grove is still in flux. Orange fencing surrounds the area near the adobe ruins that borders the grove, and certain spaces are marked out in a way that suggest something is planned. Perhaps I've never mentioned the ruins before. It's hard to give you the scope of it with my simple camera, but here's a try:
It's not the Parthenon, but there is still something sacred in this to me, even or perhaps especially in the graffiti. There is a sacredness in the way we leave our artful marks on things. I love the way recent generations have come up with ways to do this even in urban landscapes. Graffiti, skateboarding, and parkour are all ways to use and add to the mundane and manmade in elevated ways, turning the utilitarian into the artful, for the sheer joy of it. (I must mention here that I love the concept of Tess' blog, Sacred Graffiti; I highly recommend you visit there.)
After some inquiry at the gift shop, I discovered that the activity around the ruins is because an archaeology group is doing excavation. When the church was first built, it was surrounded by a fort, and the buildings later became private residences, many of which are still occupied. Since those buildings hold a lot of history, it makes sense that an archaeology group would be interested in the ruins.
On the other side of the ruins is the church lot, a deep contrast in its manicured beauty. Now that things have calmed down a bit over there, I've been able to settle in and enjoy it again. Today, a man was revarnishing the benches in the courtyard.
I love to see the seasonal changes over there. The flowers that the hawkmoths come to aren't blooming yet, but the rose bushes are in full bloom, something I missed last year because I didn't start walking to the church until after the blossoms had faded.
Clare, the Virgin of Guadalupe, and their roses. Notice the ruins in the background. |
I don't know. If I've learned anything in my four decades here on Earth, it's that it's a long road from ideology to integration. But on this Solstice day of honoring sacred sites, it feels like an appropriate rumination. Graffiti and roses, skateboarding and birdflight, excavation and pollination, pruning, enjarre, restoration, decomposition - my former student would say these things are equal to each other, equally natural. What has always appealed most to me about the St. Francis church, which is the most sacred place in the world to me, is the dance among nature, culture, spirituality, religion, art, tradition. And the paradoxes in all of it, the paradox in my relationship to it as an intimate outsider.
What better way to honor the seasonal changes of nature and sacred sites both "natural" and manmade than to perceive ourselves as fully integrated with and responsible for them the way we are responsible for our own selves? This is also National Prayer Day, and the only prayer I have is for this, and then to rest in the holy paradoxes, the mysteries to be integrated within and beyond our ideologies.
Labels:
Byron Katie,
creation/Creator,
crows,
death,
enjarre,
gradual change,
integration,
prayer,
Ranchos de Taos,
San Francisco de Asis church,
Solstice,
St. Francis,
The Way It Is,
trees
Saturday, June 12, 2010
The Ruthless Gardener
Bell near St. Clare's statue in the San Francisco de Asis courtyard
As I continue to practice dropping out of my mind and into my body, several interesting things have been occurring. One is that my normal state of intense study and research is becoming less normal. I simply don't have the same intensity of thinking, which also means less writing. I've been finding myself at a loss to even comment on all of your blogs. Even this post is more like an eruption than a coherent thought process.
At the same time, my level of physical activity has accelerated quite a bit. As I'm spending more time in my body than my head, really listening to it, I hear that it wants to move and work, for the sheer joy of it. I have taken up running with a zest I didn't know was possible. For most of my life, physical activity was something I thought about doing, felt like I should be doing, but didn't actually want to do. Now I look forward to it, and find myself having to temper my enthusiasm so I don't OVERdo it. I've also been working in the yard, gardening. I planted pumpkins, and they sprouted! My arms are sore today from pulling up weeds. There is an incredible level of satisfaction in all of this.
But nothing stays the same. I simply don't know from day to day what my perspective will be. It's as though things are shaking loose within me, swirling about, uprooted. I worked hard on trying to let go of a thing I wanted. That didn't work. So I started praying earnestly for that thing, something I'd never tried before. I prayed specifically and articulately every day with all my heart. Until I discovered I didn't really want what I was praying for. What a paradox - when I tried to not want it I wanted it more, and when I gave myself over to wanting it, I stopped wanting it.
Now the loud voice of wanting in my head is shrieking with rage because I've abandoned it and it doesn't have an anchor anymore. It's desperately trying to seek one, and I'm just watching and listening. Not judging, not giving in to its ludicrous demands, just seeing. Just hearing. Go ahead and rant and rave, I can't stop you anyway. I will just wait here in the quiet you can't touch until you diminish, which is already happening and is in fact the reason you're being so obnoxious, trying to cling to life.
Nothing stays the same. Everything shifts and sometimes that looks "wrong" or dangerous. "To enjarre or not to enjarre" got pushed way into the background this week because I got very sick. I won't go into the details, but I was showing exact symptoms of a pretty serious condition. However, by the time the doctor looked at me, the symptoms were gone and my tests came back fine. I'm convinced that I made myself sick by listening to the shrieking voice. I let it take me over for a couple of days, and became unguarded enough that the tumult of emotion that accompanied that rotten thinking caused something like an oil spill in my body.
When I finally felt better physically, and could listen to the shrieking without being taken over by it, I was eager to go for a run. It had been days since my enjarre encounter. I waited until evening so there would be no crowds at the church, since I was still not quite ready to deal with that challenge.
Nothing stays the same. Have I mentioned how very much I love the little grove by the church? Well, they cut down most of the trees. They only left the ones around the perimeter, but essentially, the grove is no longer. It's just an empty lot full of tree stumps. They took down the tire swing my son and his friend strung up with an old garden hose; in fact the tree it was hanging from is gone. I'm welling up with tears as I write this, as I did when I first saw it.
Nothing stays the same, but everything outward is reflected inwardly with an eternal tint. I think of the metaphor of pruning in John 15. Some prunings are bigger than others. Sometimes life is pruned so radically it's alarming, and doesn't fit my idea of how things "should" be. Do I really ultimately know what "health" means? Do I really know what is for the ultimate good of myself or the world?
Oil spills, sickness, destruction of trees. All ranting and raving is a wall of nothing against such things. These things happen, and I see them all together. I see in them meaning and connection that suggest a story I cannot fully tell. I hear in them only the call to awaken, the thunder of tremendous bells.
Labels:
armchair theology,
bells,
Bible,
creation/Creator,
ego crap,
enjarre,
gardening,
messiness,
running,
San Francisco de Asis church,
sorrow,
the body,
The Way It Is,
violence,
writing
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Backstory
As it turns out, I have given up church for Lent.
Will I go back once Lent is over? I don't know. I have no idea what's going to happen next in any area of my life. I'm out of control. (I looked all over for it - I'm definitely out.) Hurray!
Giving up attachment to stories. Surrendering all goals except awakening, the paradox being that to awaken, even that goal must be surrendered.
Learning to say Yes to everything. As someone very wise once pointed out, Yes is surrender.
I started out by giving up bitching for Lent. That was the surface goal, but I recognized that to truly do this, I had to give up the negative thinking that leads to bitching in the first place, otherwise it would just be a sorry attempt at control.
When I announced my intention on my blog, Dan recommended Byron Katie and The Work. I began to explore that website, then mentioned what I was discovering there to Jennifer, who suggested I also read The Power of Now by Eckhart Tolle. From there began an amazingly rapid process of unraveling:
To give up bitching I had to undo negative thinking. To undo negative thinking I had to look at my beliefs, which led to examining the stories I tell myself, which led finally to seeing that all stories are untrue. Even the good ones.
I came to the edge of this forest once before, a long time ago, but I wasn't ready to enter then. There were still stories I wanted to believe, and I didn't understand that one doesn't come to Reality by denying the body (or the world) and its stories, but by fully entering into them with an alert and embracing yet questioning mind.
To see the world as illusion or Maya is not to blow it all off and sit in your head. It's merely to perceive the deeper Reality that is the Source. (I feel like A.A. Milne, using all these caps.) That was one of my biggest stumbling blocks when I tried to come to this before, and I ultimately found myself lost. That's when I turned to the Bible and church.
In adopting a biblical worldview, one of the greatest joys was in experiencing the earth and myself as Creation, as real. (Now I'm thinking of The Velveteen Rabbit.) Reading the Bible, especially some of the beautiful nature imagery in the Psalms, and shifting my worldview this way turned me into an environmentalist and a social activist, because I finally had permission to care, to love Creation and all of its creatures. Before that, when I saw the world as illusion, as something to be transcended, I didn't see it at all let alone feel that I wanted to care for it.
And so I entered a new paradigm, one in which there was a true Presence and Creative Intelligence who loved the earth, who made it and continues to make it in every moment, and who - could it possibly be??? - loved me. Forgave me. A Being who I didn't have to keep trying to climb some endless ladder to get to, who was instead reaching down to me, just where I was with all of my flaws. I spiritually relaxed for the first time in years, maybe ever. I accepted the gift that I now saw was always being offered, and realized that this was all I'd ever had to do to be with God. In Christianity, that gift comes in the form of Christ.
I had spent so much time and energy trying (and failing) to connect with a formless, distant God, that it was an immense relief to embrace the incarnate version. So much more accessible. The Son became for me the access point to the Divine and to my own incarnation, the intersection of the ineffable and the tangible. This is one of the most important symbolic meanings of the cross for me.
It makes perfect sense to me that if there is a God that God would take the form of a human to be able to communicate in a language humans can hear and comprehend.
Now, as this most powerful and unexpected Lenten journey winds down toward Easter, I find myself considering anew the Resurrection. There are those who never seem to get to that part of the story. There are others who try to jump straight to it and miss the point of the way of the cross, which is about surrender, the ultimate Yes. Without that Yes, resurrection is impossible. However, the Yes can only happen because it sees the deeper Reality that makes resurrection not only possible but inevitable.
Asking if (or stating that) Jesus and the Resurrection really happened loses all importance when one comes to the point of view that nothing has ever really happened, no story is true except in the telling. Anything with a beginning, middle, and end necessarily falls into the realm of illusion because the present moment is the only ultimately real thing, and the Being within it.
Gradual change occurs in an instant. And now, all that's left is love.
Will I go back once Lent is over? I don't know. I have no idea what's going to happen next in any area of my life. I'm out of control. (I looked all over for it - I'm definitely out.) Hurray!
Giving up attachment to stories. Surrendering all goals except awakening, the paradox being that to awaken, even that goal must be surrendered.
Learning to say Yes to everything. As someone very wise once pointed out, Yes is surrender.
I started out by giving up bitching for Lent. That was the surface goal, but I recognized that to truly do this, I had to give up the negative thinking that leads to bitching in the first place, otherwise it would just be a sorry attempt at control.
When I announced my intention on my blog, Dan recommended Byron Katie and The Work. I began to explore that website, then mentioned what I was discovering there to Jennifer, who suggested I also read The Power of Now by Eckhart Tolle. From there began an amazingly rapid process of unraveling:
To give up bitching I had to undo negative thinking. To undo negative thinking I had to look at my beliefs, which led to examining the stories I tell myself, which led finally to seeing that all stories are untrue. Even the good ones.
I came to the edge of this forest once before, a long time ago, but I wasn't ready to enter then. There were still stories I wanted to believe, and I didn't understand that one doesn't come to Reality by denying the body (or the world) and its stories, but by fully entering into them with an alert and embracing yet questioning mind.
To see the world as illusion or Maya is not to blow it all off and sit in your head. It's merely to perceive the deeper Reality that is the Source. (I feel like A.A. Milne, using all these caps.) That was one of my biggest stumbling blocks when I tried to come to this before, and I ultimately found myself lost. That's when I turned to the Bible and church.
In adopting a biblical worldview, one of the greatest joys was in experiencing the earth and myself as Creation, as real. (Now I'm thinking of The Velveteen Rabbit.) Reading the Bible, especially some of the beautiful nature imagery in the Psalms, and shifting my worldview this way turned me into an environmentalist and a social activist, because I finally had permission to care, to love Creation and all of its creatures. Before that, when I saw the world as illusion, as something to be transcended, I didn't see it at all let alone feel that I wanted to care for it.
And so I entered a new paradigm, one in which there was a true Presence and Creative Intelligence who loved the earth, who made it and continues to make it in every moment, and who - could it possibly be??? - loved me. Forgave me. A Being who I didn't have to keep trying to climb some endless ladder to get to, who was instead reaching down to me, just where I was with all of my flaws. I spiritually relaxed for the first time in years, maybe ever. I accepted the gift that I now saw was always being offered, and realized that this was all I'd ever had to do to be with God. In Christianity, that gift comes in the form of Christ.
I had spent so much time and energy trying (and failing) to connect with a formless, distant God, that it was an immense relief to embrace the incarnate version. So much more accessible. The Son became for me the access point to the Divine and to my own incarnation, the intersection of the ineffable and the tangible. This is one of the most important symbolic meanings of the cross for me.
It makes perfect sense to me that if there is a God that God would take the form of a human to be able to communicate in a language humans can hear and comprehend.
Now, as this most powerful and unexpected Lenten journey winds down toward Easter, I find myself considering anew the Resurrection. There are those who never seem to get to that part of the story. There are others who try to jump straight to it and miss the point of the way of the cross, which is about surrender, the ultimate Yes. Without that Yes, resurrection is impossible. However, the Yes can only happen because it sees the deeper Reality that makes resurrection not only possible but inevitable.
Asking if (or stating that) Jesus and the Resurrection really happened loses all importance when one comes to the point of view that nothing has ever really happened, no story is true except in the telling. Anything with a beginning, middle, and end necessarily falls into the realm of illusion because the present moment is the only ultimately real thing, and the Being within it.
And so, as I contemplate the Jesus story during a time in which all stories are dissolving, what I see, the true beauty of this and any good story - which is any story rightly perceived - is that the point is to go beyond the story into the Yes, the surrender, the all-encompassing Now that is eternal reality. In that Yes are both the crucifixion and the resurrection; in this one moment they occur simultaneously, and are seen for the stories they are.
Gradual change occurs in an instant. And now, all that's left is love.
Labels:
about me,
armchair theology,
Bible,
Byron Katie,
Christianity,
creation/Creator,
defragmentation,
Eckhart Tolle,
freedom,
God,
grace,
gradual change,
Jesus,
Lent,
stories,
The Way It Is,
The Work
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Alone With Love
Ash Wednesday is almost upon me. The first day of Lent. A day to begin forty days of fasting. What for? What is the purpose of this? Self-deprivation. It's no fun. I face Lent each year with a kind of dread. Why do this to myself?
Today is Mardi Gras, the feast before the fast. I don't feel inspired about what I'm giving up this year. I don't feel ready. I've dedicated this year to quiet love, and I'm giving up bitching for Lent. I'm giving up negative expression, but more than that, deeper than that, my goal is to give up negative thought. So what should my "feast" be? A bitchfest, no doubt. Which, come to think of it, puts me in the great biblical tradition of people like Job, who mightily complained to God when things didn't go his way.
There are so many things I can bitch about from traffic to the uncertainty I feel in my own heart. But what I really want to focus on is the unfairness of the blindness it seems I'm doomed to wander through life with. The inevitable pain and sorrow, the intolerable length of time it takes for any real healing to occur, despite my unending attempts to focus on this healing. The fact that all I've wanted for years is a true partner in life, someone to raise my children and build a home with, and that I still don't have that, and it's increasingly looking like I never will. One of my children has already grown up and moved out and another one will in a year. I'm on my own.
Despite knowing what holds me back from the kind of love and partnership I want, I find myself unable to make the changes that would allow this. At least not fast enough. And the irony is that these very issues are the ones my last potential partner could least deal with because of his issues, which in turn were the last I could deal with.
Why is life this way? It's a mystery, a paradox, and very often I find beauty and comfort in this, but, honestly, sometimes IT JUST SUCKS.
And at times like this, it becomes completely obvious that it's all about death. The destination is the grave for the body and the refiner's fire for the ego. I can go kicking and screaming, or I can go willingly. But seriously - who is going to go to the fire and the grave without a little kicking and screaming? Does it even really matter?
Of course it does. The grace with or without which I submit to these things makes all the difference in the world. And I know this, but sometimes it's still impossible to find that grace, to live it.
I look and look for the love that will make me whole, but death reminds me, the fire shows me, that there is no other option but to find it in myself. The wellspring of love is within me, and I will be comforted and healed by it there, or not at all. I am alone with love, or I am just alone.
So this is the purpose of Lent. To deprive myself of external things that only seem to give me what I want and need, in order to be less distracted from the true source of love.
And while I'm feeling sorry for myself because I'm not in Louisiana for Mardi Gras, and try to find the Mardi Gras Mambo on YouTube to cheer myself up, instead I find something that reminds me in more than one way of how little I truly have to bitch about:
Today is Mardi Gras, the feast before the fast. I don't feel inspired about what I'm giving up this year. I don't feel ready. I've dedicated this year to quiet love, and I'm giving up bitching for Lent. I'm giving up negative expression, but more than that, deeper than that, my goal is to give up negative thought. So what should my "feast" be? A bitchfest, no doubt. Which, come to think of it, puts me in the great biblical tradition of people like Job, who mightily complained to God when things didn't go his way.
There are so many things I can bitch about from traffic to the uncertainty I feel in my own heart. But what I really want to focus on is the unfairness of the blindness it seems I'm doomed to wander through life with. The inevitable pain and sorrow, the intolerable length of time it takes for any real healing to occur, despite my unending attempts to focus on this healing. The fact that all I've wanted for years is a true partner in life, someone to raise my children and build a home with, and that I still don't have that, and it's increasingly looking like I never will. One of my children has already grown up and moved out and another one will in a year. I'm on my own.
Despite knowing what holds me back from the kind of love and partnership I want, I find myself unable to make the changes that would allow this. At least not fast enough. And the irony is that these very issues are the ones my last potential partner could least deal with because of his issues, which in turn were the last I could deal with.
Why is life this way? It's a mystery, a paradox, and very often I find beauty and comfort in this, but, honestly, sometimes IT JUST SUCKS.
And at times like this, it becomes completely obvious that it's all about death. The destination is the grave for the body and the refiner's fire for the ego. I can go kicking and screaming, or I can go willingly. But seriously - who is going to go to the fire and the grave without a little kicking and screaming? Does it even really matter?
Of course it does. The grace with or without which I submit to these things makes all the difference in the world. And I know this, but sometimes it's still impossible to find that grace, to live it.
I look and look for the love that will make me whole, but death reminds me, the fire shows me, that there is no other option but to find it in myself. The wellspring of love is within me, and I will be comforted and healed by it there, or not at all. I am alone with love, or I am just alone.
So this is the purpose of Lent. To deprive myself of external things that only seem to give me what I want and need, in order to be less distracted from the true source of love.
And while I'm feeling sorry for myself because I'm not in Louisiana for Mardi Gras, and try to find the Mardi Gras Mambo on YouTube to cheer myself up, instead I find something that reminds me in more than one way of how little I truly have to bitch about:
Saturday, January 9, 2010
The Epiphany Chronicles I: The Disconsolate Chimera
January 4
Words strain,
Crack and sometimes break, under the burden,
Under the tension, slip, slide, perish,
Decay with imprecision, will not stay in place,
Will not stay still. Shrieking voices
Scolding, mocking, or merely chattering,
Always assail them. The Word in the desert
Is most attacked by voices of temptation,
The crying shadow in the funeral dance,
The loud lament of the disconsolate chimera.
~T.S. Eliot, “Burnt Norton”
The day went well until the afternoon, when I began to feel exceedingly tired and grumpy, and it got progressively worse as day went down to evening. This went beyond a simple mood or a physical state even though I kept trying to tell myself I was just “tired” as a way to stop my fouled mind from traveling down negative paths. I felt as though I was doused in an evil black sludge and could barely move under it.
There was a time when I operated under something like this a large portion of the time, and then it seemed normal to me, because I was so utterly unaware in that state. Amazingly, I didn't even think I felt bad when I was like that. The main reasons I'm aware of it now are that a) I've grown to the point where I don't fall into that state very often so it's more obvious when I do, and b) I've hurt people I love by things I've done under that thick spiritual smog, and they've let me know. Thank God.
There was a time when I operated under something like this a large portion of the time, and then it seemed normal to me, because I was so utterly unaware in that state. Amazingly, I didn't even think I felt bad when I was like that. The main reasons I'm aware of it now are that a) I've grown to the point where I don't fall into that state very often so it's more obvious when I do, and b) I've hurt people I love by things I've done under that thick spiritual smog, and they've let me know. Thank God.
I hadn't found myself in a state this awful in a long time. And I couldn't make it go away.
I was supposed to go out to dinner with my beloved that night; we'd been planning it for days and had already had to reschedule a couple of times. I was determined to go, and since I've taken on this theme of “quiet love” for 2010, I convinced myself that I could control the intense negativity that I was feeling.
You can probably guess how well that worked. Sigh. I can hear you saying, "No, Susan, don't do it!" I wish you'd been there that night.
We wanted to go to the Ranchos Plaza Grill, next to the St. Francis church. It has the best traditional New Mexican food I've ever had, a cozy warm ambiance created by the soft adobe walls, old wood floors, and simple Spanish guitar. I was especially looking forward to the pinto beans. Mmmm.
Alas – they were closed. So we drove, and drove, and ended up at Applebees. It seems like we always end up there. Justin really likes it. I don't mind it most of the time, but was not much in the mood that night, given the circumstances. And unfortunately, it was “game night,” meaning that in addition to the annoying pop music puffing through the speakers, there was also a very loud (football?) game showing on the TV.
Even so, I made it through most of the dinner without being entirely negative, but I kept very consciously biting my tongue. And then I didn't. And it all spiraled downward until I was saying unkind things and hating myself for it and then finding myself in tears and running out of the restaurant while Justin paid the bill.
I was utterly horrified and couldn't even begin to fathom how I'd let myself fall into this when I knew – I KNEW – better. And had been consciously, deliberately, carefully controlling myself.
You can probably guess how well that worked. Sigh. I can hear you saying, "No, Susan, don't do it!" I wish you'd been there that night.
We wanted to go to the Ranchos Plaza Grill, next to the St. Francis church. It has the best traditional New Mexican food I've ever had, a cozy warm ambiance created by the soft adobe walls, old wood floors, and simple Spanish guitar. I was especially looking forward to the pinto beans. Mmmm.
Alas – they were closed. So we drove, and drove, and ended up at Applebees. It seems like we always end up there. Justin really likes it. I don't mind it most of the time, but was not much in the mood that night, given the circumstances. And unfortunately, it was “game night,” meaning that in addition to the annoying pop music puffing through the speakers, there was also a very loud (football?) game showing on the TV.
Even so, I made it through most of the dinner without being entirely negative, but I kept very consciously biting my tongue. And then I didn't. And it all spiraled downward until I was saying unkind things and hating myself for it and then finding myself in tears and running out of the restaurant while Justin paid the bill.
I was utterly horrified and couldn't even begin to fathom how I'd let myself fall into this when I knew – I KNEW – better. And had been consciously, deliberately, carefully controlling myself.
What I then had to realize, my unhappy epiphany, was that as much as I might want to wish away some of the deep fears and pain I have collected, it just doesn't work that way, and at a point of least resistance, usually with a loved one, it's going to come out. And when it does, it ruins everything, and pushes people away. For Justin, because of some of his childhood issues, it makes him unable to trust my “quiet love,” and makes healing just that much farther out of reach for both of us.
Other times that things like this have happened, I've immediately starting telling myself hopeful stories about what I'll do differently next time, and subtly justifying myself to myself. But there was something about the intensity and stark obviousness of where I actually WAS this time that made it impossible for me to do that. No amount of analysis or resolve was going to change it. It's deeper than the part of my mind that engages in those activities. So deep it scares me. There was nothing for me to do but surrender my efforts to control and change it, and simply accept that, even with the (painfully slow) progress I've made in this area, it's still Part of Who I Am. Yuck. It's part of who I am.
Other times that things like this have happened, I've immediately starting telling myself hopeful stories about what I'll do differently next time, and subtly justifying myself to myself. But there was something about the intensity and stark obviousness of where I actually WAS this time that made it impossible for me to do that. No amount of analysis or resolve was going to change it. It's deeper than the part of my mind that engages in those activities. So deep it scares me. There was nothing for me to do but surrender my efforts to control and change it, and simply accept that, even with the (painfully slow) progress I've made in this area, it's still Part of Who I Am. Yuck. It's part of who I am.
And this is not a happy ending.
But it might be a good beginning.
But it might be a good beginning.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Swan Song for The Moment
I can't believe it took me so long to discover the joys of blogging. In the few weeks since I started, I've already found and followed some fascinating connections, and met some truly wonderful people. The best thing about blogging is the conversations that happen, the sparks of inspiration that people start and pick up on and spread.
In the past couple of days, the word "interlacing" has appeared on two separate blogs that I follow. In Song Lines, the most recent post on a hazy moon, a commenter used this word, and then on The Bobwhites, which I discovered via the "Next Blog" button, "Interlacing" was a blog title.
Dictionary.com defines "interlace" as: "to cross one another, typically passing alternately over and under, as if woven together." How beautiful is it that I'm exploring this word because of interlacing blogs?
One of the themes that has emerged for me recently out of this interlacing is the relationship between freedom and safety. It started with Jennifer's post, What is a Safe Person? (I'll come back to this in a moment). Then, in the remedial college Reading class that I teach, we're reading Steinbeck's The Pearl. When Kino finds The Pearl of the World and tries to sell it in town, the pearl buyers try to cheat him, offering a much lower price than the pearl is worth. In class we discussed Kino's decision not to accept their offer. By refusing it, he is standing up against a system that has oppressed his people for a long time, and therefore is putting himself in danger. Freedom and safety are opposites.
This got me thinking. Wasn't it Ben Franklin who said, "Those who would choose safety over freedom deserve neither"? Why? Is freedom inherently more valuable than safety, and if so why? Is it just more "real"? I think it's the pursuit of safety over freedom that Ben was criticizing. That this pursuit is fear-based. But seeking freedom often is too. I've encountered a lot of people who seem to equate freedom with mobility of some kind. The ability to get out. Is this not fear-based? The need for open spaces is no "better" than the need for fences.
Another twisted expression of "freedom" is really recklessness in a very thin disguise. I used to fall into this category. Freedom to me meant being able to do whatever I wanted without restriction. The result? Harm to myself and others, of course. Some of which I'm still dealing with today.
In my reading class we talked about how one people's freedom can be taken away so another people can feel safer. I mentioned the internment camps of Japanese-Americans that were set up during World War II, and we discussed the racial profiling of Middle Eastern people (and others) that's been happening since 9/11. Where do you draw the line when it comes to creating safety? is the question we tackled, but could not arrive at a consensus. And apparently, no one ever has, except maybe certain Gandhi-esque organizations. Whole nations though? Forget it.
The question is too abstract, too philosophical. Too unsafe. Define freedom. Define safety. Can you do it off the top of your head? Now go ask your neighbor the same question. Leave your gun at home.
The principle of oppression for the sake of safety can even be seen in nature. A minor example that I came across recently has to do with the way flowers secure pollination. Many flowers have evolved methods of depositing pollen on bees in a way that the bee can't get the pollen off. Only by entering another flower of the same kind, that's equipped to scrape the pollen, will the bee become free of it. A bee may fly around for days with a big clump of pollen stuck to one of these “safe sites” - say on the top of the head, or the abdomen. It's like an itch in the middle of your back you can't quite reach.
Some people seem to equate freedom with NOT feeling safe - atheist fundamentalists, deconstructionist zealots - who say either directly or indirectly: Only stupid (i.e.,unfree) people feel safe. Like most extremist statements, there is a grain of truth to it. Many people do coddle themselves into a stupor by any number of sad little means. But I think, life being what it is, we all do it sometimes.
I think it's just all about balance. An excess of freedom (in the sense, let's say, of expanding boundaries) makes us swing back to safety-seeking, because we get afraid. In fact, my life has been like that lately. Because of blogging, teaching again, and joining a non-profit board, I've really been putting myself "out there," after a long cocooning period. Sometimes I need to step back, regroup. The point, I think, is to do this with awareness, as a means to keep growing - not as an escape or shutting down.
With this awareness, comes the realization that there is a place where freedom and safety coexist. Jennifer's post deals with the idea that for freedom to exist in an intimate relationship, there must be a sense of safety, real trust. And they grow in proportion to each other.
And yet, this kind of trust opens you to that strange recognition of the Other, suddenly seeing how big you both are, on opposite sides of a universe that you're meeting across. And embracing there is the least safe thing you can do, ego-wise.
Which just goes to show how differently the ego and the spirit can define both freedom and safety. This is why, to me, true freedom is a paradox. There is a freedom in decisiveness, commitment to a path. The fish isn't free if he escapes the bowl. Bees enjoy the freedom to be sky-wanderers, to fly to many flowers, but this comes through participating in a highly structured and disciplined society. As a poet, it took me a long time to embrace anything but free verse. When I finally learned to write formal poetry, I realized the potential in submitting to a discipline. By mastering a form, you gain a new kind of freedom. The same is true of dance, or painting, or raising children. Boundaries, parameters must be recognized and accepted before they can be expanded.
All of this is so complex. I hope I haven't lost anybody here. Really, I think it's very simple - If you feel free, you are. Because freedom is a state of being, not a set of circumstances. The best analogy I can come up with is singing in prison. One of my very favorite bible stories is in Acts 16, when Paul and Silas sing in a jail cell, until an earthquake breaks the bars. I also think of the line from Tori Amos' song, "Crucify": You're just an empty cage if you kill the bird.
Kim Ayres recently posted here about starting a day off grumpy, but eventually being drawn out of it by a scene of beauty. Responding to beauty, to the moment, allowing oneself to be drawn out of misery – that's freedom. It comes with awareness. It's the ability to sing in a cage, to love your enemy. And this is also the only safety there is.
One of Kim's commenters gave some interesting info about swan folklore, since a swan was featured in the photos on that post. What really got me thinking was the concept of the “swan song.” According to Wikipedia, “The phrase "swan song" is a reference to an ancient belief that the Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) is completely mute during its lifetime until the moment just before it dies, when it sings one beautiful song.” And so, says Wikipedia:
Freedom is the swan song in every moment.
In the past couple of days, the word "interlacing" has appeared on two separate blogs that I follow. In Song Lines, the most recent post on a hazy moon, a commenter used this word, and then on The Bobwhites, which I discovered via the "Next Blog" button, "Interlacing" was a blog title.
Dictionary.com defines "interlace" as: "to cross one another, typically passing alternately over and under, as if woven together." How beautiful is it that I'm exploring this word because of interlacing blogs?
One of the themes that has emerged for me recently out of this interlacing is the relationship between freedom and safety. It started with Jennifer's post, What is a Safe Person? (I'll come back to this in a moment). Then, in the remedial college Reading class that I teach, we're reading Steinbeck's The Pearl. When Kino finds The Pearl of the World and tries to sell it in town, the pearl buyers try to cheat him, offering a much lower price than the pearl is worth. In class we discussed Kino's decision not to accept their offer. By refusing it, he is standing up against a system that has oppressed his people for a long time, and therefore is putting himself in danger. Freedom and safety are opposites.
This got me thinking. Wasn't it Ben Franklin who said, "Those who would choose safety over freedom deserve neither"? Why? Is freedom inherently more valuable than safety, and if so why? Is it just more "real"? I think it's the pursuit of safety over freedom that Ben was criticizing. That this pursuit is fear-based. But seeking freedom often is too. I've encountered a lot of people who seem to equate freedom with mobility of some kind. The ability to get out. Is this not fear-based? The need for open spaces is no "better" than the need for fences.
Another twisted expression of "freedom" is really recklessness in a very thin disguise. I used to fall into this category. Freedom to me meant being able to do whatever I wanted without restriction. The result? Harm to myself and others, of course. Some of which I'm still dealing with today.
In my reading class we talked about how one people's freedom can be taken away so another people can feel safer. I mentioned the internment camps of Japanese-Americans that were set up during World War II, and we discussed the racial profiling of Middle Eastern people (and others) that's been happening since 9/11. Where do you draw the line when it comes to creating safety? is the question we tackled, but could not arrive at a consensus. And apparently, no one ever has, except maybe certain Gandhi-esque organizations. Whole nations though? Forget it.
The question is too abstract, too philosophical. Too unsafe. Define freedom. Define safety. Can you do it off the top of your head? Now go ask your neighbor the same question. Leave your gun at home.
The principle of oppression for the sake of safety can even be seen in nature. A minor example that I came across recently has to do with the way flowers secure pollination. Many flowers have evolved methods of depositing pollen on bees in a way that the bee can't get the pollen off. Only by entering another flower of the same kind, that's equipped to scrape the pollen, will the bee become free of it. A bee may fly around for days with a big clump of pollen stuck to one of these “safe sites” - say on the top of the head, or the abdomen. It's like an itch in the middle of your back you can't quite reach.
Some people seem to equate freedom with NOT feeling safe - atheist fundamentalists, deconstructionist zealots - who say either directly or indirectly: Only stupid (i.e.,unfree) people feel safe. Like most extremist statements, there is a grain of truth to it. Many people do coddle themselves into a stupor by any number of sad little means. But I think, life being what it is, we all do it sometimes.
I think it's just all about balance. An excess of freedom (in the sense, let's say, of expanding boundaries) makes us swing back to safety-seeking, because we get afraid. In fact, my life has been like that lately. Because of blogging, teaching again, and joining a non-profit board, I've really been putting myself "out there," after a long cocooning period. Sometimes I need to step back, regroup. The point, I think, is to do this with awareness, as a means to keep growing - not as an escape or shutting down.
With this awareness, comes the realization that there is a place where freedom and safety coexist. Jennifer's post deals with the idea that for freedom to exist in an intimate relationship, there must be a sense of safety, real trust. And they grow in proportion to each other.
And yet, this kind of trust opens you to that strange recognition of the Other, suddenly seeing how big you both are, on opposite sides of a universe that you're meeting across. And embracing there is the least safe thing you can do, ego-wise.
Which just goes to show how differently the ego and the spirit can define both freedom and safety. This is why, to me, true freedom is a paradox. There is a freedom in decisiveness, commitment to a path. The fish isn't free if he escapes the bowl. Bees enjoy the freedom to be sky-wanderers, to fly to many flowers, but this comes through participating in a highly structured and disciplined society. As a poet, it took me a long time to embrace anything but free verse. When I finally learned to write formal poetry, I realized the potential in submitting to a discipline. By mastering a form, you gain a new kind of freedom. The same is true of dance, or painting, or raising children. Boundaries, parameters must be recognized and accepted before they can be expanded.
All of this is so complex. I hope I haven't lost anybody here. Really, I think it's very simple - If you feel free, you are. Because freedom is a state of being, not a set of circumstances. The best analogy I can come up with is singing in prison. One of my very favorite bible stories is in Acts 16, when Paul and Silas sing in a jail cell, until an earthquake breaks the bars. I also think of the line from Tori Amos' song, "Crucify": You're just an empty cage if you kill the bird.
Kim Ayres recently posted here about starting a day off grumpy, but eventually being drawn out of it by a scene of beauty. Responding to beauty, to the moment, allowing oneself to be drawn out of misery – that's freedom. It comes with awareness. It's the ability to sing in a cage, to love your enemy. And this is also the only safety there is.
One of Kim's commenters gave some interesting info about swan folklore, since a swan was featured in the photos on that post. What really got me thinking was the concept of the “swan song.” According to Wikipedia, “The phrase "swan song" is a reference to an ancient belief that the Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) is completely mute during its lifetime until the moment just before it dies, when it sings one beautiful song.” And so, says Wikipedia:
By extension, "swan song" has become an idiom referring to a final theatrical or dramatic appearance, or any final work or accomplishment. It generally carries the connotation that the performer is aware that this is the last performance of his or her lifetime, and is expending everything in one magnificent final effort.There is a Zen story about a man being chased by a tiger until he comes to the edge of a cliff. He clambers over the side and grabs hold of a vine. As he's hanging there, he sees that there's another tiger below him, waiting for him to fall. And then two mice come along and start gnawing at the vine. He notices some strawberries growing on the cliff face next to him, and sees the most luscious red strawberry he's ever seen. He reaches over, picks it and eats it. And he thinks to himself, “Ah, how sweet it is!”
Freedom is the swan song in every moment.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Pumpkins and Pollinators: Part Two
So where is the dark side of the pumpkin?
In her delightful and devastatingly educational book, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, Barbara Kingsolver advocates eating fresh, locally grown food as much as possible. She comments on the absurdity of the fact that people in droves buy pumpkins for their Halloween jack-o-lanterns but then throw them away after Halloween and buy canned pumpkin for their Thanksgiving pies.
I maintain that the global food market is at least as evil as global warming and indeed contributes greatly to it, but because our food is almost as close as our breath, the big picture can be hard to see. For a better idea of it, go to animalvegetablemiracle.org. Click on some of its resources links - but be forewarned - it may change forever the way you feel about eating a banana.
The other dark issue I'm thinking about today, because I'm thinking about pumpkins, is the pollination crisis. Which is, of course, unavoidably intertwined with the global food crisis.
Stephen L. Buchmann and Gary Paul Nabhan, authors of the The Forgotten Pollinators, say that bees of the genera Peponapis possess superior ability to pollinate pumpkins and others in the squash family. In fact, these "squash" or "gourd bees" show up at the crack of dawn, when blossoms are first opening, beating out honeybees by about half an hour. They also visit squash blossoms more often than other pollinators, and are, according to the authors, "strong fliers that frequently move pollen between far-flung plants of the same species, thereby promoting genetic diversity."
But these bees are in decline for a number of reasons, including pesticide use and habitats disturbed by human activity. Most commercial pumpkins are now pollinated by domesticated honeybees, but there is still often an inadequate number of pollinators, in which case farmers resort to hand pollination. Artificial insemination, if you will.
The message of The Forgotten Pollinators is that the relationship between pollinators and plants is so important and delicate that if one declines, the other often will too. And therefore so will we. It's not much of a stretch to imagine how the overall ecology of the planet is affected by the myriad of such relationships. And this is the point, really - that the problem is not just extinction of species but extinction of relationships.
I love honeybees, but their domestication and humanly created ubiquity is a major contributor to the decline of native pollinators. Kind of like how Wal-Mart puts the Mom-and-Pop grocery out of business. And when you personally know that sweet couple, Mom and Pop, it pisses you off all the more. The squash bee and blossom are a sweet couple too:
Now don't get me wrong - I still sometimes buy convenience and fast foods, and my household consumes way too much coffee to always go the fair-trade organic route. And I still regularly buy bananas for my toddler's breakfast, even though the amount of fossil fuel required to get them to the local grocery store is outrageous.
But I've made little changes, here and there, and they add up over time. It's like the advice you always read about starting an exercise program or diet - don't try to change it all at once; you'll just get overwhelmed and give up altogether.
I just want to keep making these changes, keep growing my awareness of The Way It Is. Get to know the birds and the bees and all my other enigmatic neighbors, and as much as I'm able, to love them as myself.
In her delightful and devastatingly educational book, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, Barbara Kingsolver advocates eating fresh, locally grown food as much as possible. She comments on the absurdity of the fact that people in droves buy pumpkins for their Halloween jack-o-lanterns but then throw them away after Halloween and buy canned pumpkin for their Thanksgiving pies.
I maintain that the global food market is at least as evil as global warming and indeed contributes greatly to it, but because our food is almost as close as our breath, the big picture can be hard to see. For a better idea of it, go to animalvegetablemiracle.org. Click on some of its resources links - but be forewarned - it may change forever the way you feel about eating a banana.
The other dark issue I'm thinking about today, because I'm thinking about pumpkins, is the pollination crisis. Which is, of course, unavoidably intertwined with the global food crisis.
Stephen L. Buchmann and Gary Paul Nabhan, authors of the The Forgotten Pollinators, say that bees of the genera Peponapis possess superior ability to pollinate pumpkins and others in the squash family. In fact, these "squash" or "gourd bees" show up at the crack of dawn, when blossoms are first opening, beating out honeybees by about half an hour. They also visit squash blossoms more often than other pollinators, and are, according to the authors, "strong fliers that frequently move pollen between far-flung plants of the same species, thereby promoting genetic diversity."
But these bees are in decline for a number of reasons, including pesticide use and habitats disturbed by human activity. Most commercial pumpkins are now pollinated by domesticated honeybees, but there is still often an inadequate number of pollinators, in which case farmers resort to hand pollination. Artificial insemination, if you will.
The message of The Forgotten Pollinators is that the relationship between pollinators and plants is so important and delicate that if one declines, the other often will too. And therefore so will we. It's not much of a stretch to imagine how the overall ecology of the planet is affected by the myriad of such relationships. And this is the point, really - that the problem is not just extinction of species but extinction of relationships.
I love honeybees, but their domestication and humanly created ubiquity is a major contributor to the decline of native pollinators. Kind of like how Wal-Mart puts the Mom-and-Pop grocery out of business. And when you personally know that sweet couple, Mom and Pop, it pisses you off all the more. The squash bee and blossom are a sweet couple too:
Pollen-covered gourd bees spend lengthy periods of time perching, grooming, and waiting on the massive gourd stigmas--behavior never observed among honeybees, nor among other native bees for that matter. These are secretive little lives that feed us.It's food for thought, no?
And when we mistreat these little lives, the repercussions may suddenly cascade in from unknown directions. (from The Forgotten Pollinators)
Now don't get me wrong - I still sometimes buy convenience and fast foods, and my household consumes way too much coffee to always go the fair-trade organic route. And I still regularly buy bananas for my toddler's breakfast, even though the amount of fossil fuel required to get them to the local grocery store is outrageous.
But I've made little changes, here and there, and they add up over time. It's like the advice you always read about starting an exercise program or diet - don't try to change it all at once; you'll just get overwhelmed and give up altogether.
I just want to keep making these changes, keep growing my awareness of The Way It Is. Get to know the birds and the bees and all my other enigmatic neighbors, and as much as I'm able, to love them as myself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)